DIFFERENTIATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF DETENTION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF COMMITTING CRIMES OF A TERRORIST NATURE AND EXTREMIST ORIENTATION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article analyzes the provisions of penal enforcement legislation and criminology related to the conditions of detention of persons sentenced to serve a criminal sentence in the form of imprisonment for committing crimes of a terrorist nature and extremist orientation, and considers a differentiated approach to determining the conditions of detention of this category of convicts. According to the results of the study, it is proposed to introduce a number of amendments to the Penal Enforcement Code of the Russian Federation, which can not only be a sure step towards the prevention and suppression of terrorist and extremist ideology in places of detention, but also contribute to the effective fight against terrorism and extremism as socially dangerous phenomena. As part of the application of a differentiated approach to the execution of imprisonment in relation to this category of convicts, it is proposed to divide them into conditions of detention. In addition, a proposal has been formulated to expand the list of conditions of detention for this category of persons.

Keywords:
differentiation, conditions of detention, terrorism, extremism, convicts, special conditions of detention, progressive system, imprisonment, optimization, anti-extremist mechanism
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Teplyashin P. V. Roditel'skiy paternalizm o nesovershennoletnih detyah, otbyvayuschih nakazanie v vide lisheniya svobody: problemnye faktory, fenomenologicheskiy aspekt i voprosy ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2020. № 3(56). S. 24–29.

2. Savushkin S. M. Differenciaciya osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody v novyh usloviyah obespecheniya bezopasnosti // Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2022. № 1(47). S. 86–91.

3. Utkin V. A. «Poryadok» i «usloviya» ispolneniya i otbyvaniya nakazaniy kak kategorii ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo prava // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. 2021. № 42. S. 99–106.

4. Petryanin A. V. Evolyuciya ugolovnoy politiki v oblasti protivodeystviya ekstremizmu i terrorizmu: tochki soprikosnoveniya proshlogo i nastoyaschego // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2019. № 4. S. 48–53.

5. Utkin V. A. «Koncepciya 2030» kak ideologiya modernizacii ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Razvitie ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy: organizacionnye, pravovye i ekonomicheskie aspekty : sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Novosibirsk, 23 maya 2019 g.) v ramkah Mezhdunar. yurid. foruma «Pravo i ekonomika: nacional'nyy opyt i strategii razvitiya». Novosibirsk : NGUEU ; Novokuzneck : Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2019. S. 156–158.

6. Savushkin S. M. Penitenciarnaya prestupnost' kak faktor differenciacii osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody // Vestnik Tomskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikacii rabotnikov FSIN Rossii. 2024. № 1(19). S. 70–75.

7. Rahmatulin Z. R. Usloviya otbyvaniya ogranicheniya svobody kak elementy progressivnoy sistemy dannogo nakazaniya // Epoha nauki. 2015. № 2. S. 12–16.

8. Skiba A. P., Skomoroh O. A. Organizacionno-pravovye problemy protivodeystviya radikal'nym proyavleniyam osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody v kontekste obespecheniya svobody sovesti i veroispovedaniya // Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2024. № 1(99). S. 62–70.

9. Brilliantov A. V. Differenciaciya nakazaniya: ugolovno-pravovye i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nye problemy : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1998. 41 s.

10. Teplyashin P. V. Preduprezhdenie soversheniya novyh prestupleniy kak cel' probacii // Eniseyskie politiko-pravovye chteniya. 2024. S. 380–385.

11. Marchenko D. E., Borchenko V. A., Drozdov A. I. Soblyudenie prav osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody, otbyvayuschih nakazanie v ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah : ucheb. posobie. Samara : Samar. yurid. in-t FSIN Rossii, 2012. 126 c.

12. Teplyashin P. V. Mnogokriterial'nyy podhod pri konkursnom otbore osuzhdennyh k uslovno-dosrochnomu osvobozhdeniyu // Prolog. 2014. № 4(8). S. 37–44.

13. Belocerkovskiy S. D. Optimizaciya ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo zakonodatel'stva v kontekste optimizacii sistemy pravovogo regulirovaniya bor'by s organizovannoy prestupnost'yu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2017. № 6. S. 273–278.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?