ON THE QUESTION OF THE EXPEDIENCY OF USING CERTAIN MEANS OF CORRECTION IN THE EXECUTION OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES (ON THE EXAMPLE OF SOCIALLY USEFUL WORK)
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article analyzes the expediency of applying the means of correction of convicts established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, implemented in the execution of criminal penalties. It is noted that the use of various means of correction when it is not required for the correction of convicts leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of the penal enforcement system due to the irrational use of its resources. The corresponding problem is considered in the context of the purposes of punishment on the example of socially useful work, to which convicted persons are involved in imprisonment for a certain period. In order to improve the execution of sentences, it is proposed to pay attention to the experience of the Scandinavian countries in terms of securing compulsory employment of convicts with a variety of specific types of occupation, among which not only socially useful work, but also other types of activities are distinguished.

Keywords:
criminal punishment, purposes of punishment, means of correction, socially useful work of convicts
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Dvoryanskov I. V. Konceptual'nye problemy celey nakazaniya // Penitenciarnaya nauka. 2021. № 2(15). S. 247-259

2. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii dlya rabotnikov prokuratury (postateynyy) / otv. red. V. V. Malinovskiy ; nauch. red. A. I. Chuchaev. M. : Kontrakt, 2011. URL : https://internet.garant.ru/#/document/58104178/paragraph/929 (data obrascheniya: 31.05.2022)

3. Bytko S. Yu., Varygin A. N. Nekotorye metodologicheskie voprosy ocenki effektivnosti predupreditel'nogo vozdeystviya ugolovnyh nakazaniy // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2019. № 1. S. 146-177

4. Seliverstov V. I. Ugolovnaya i ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya politika v sfere ispolneniya lisheniya svobody: novacii 2015 goda // Lex Russica. 2016. № 9. S. 188-204

5. Ras'kevich A. A. Obschestvenno poleznyy trud kak sredstvo ispravleniya osuzhdennyh: penitenciarnye problemy // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2010. № 2. S. 77-84

6. Utkin V. A. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya truda osuzhdennyh v ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah Rossiyskoy Federacii // Ugolovnaya yusticiya. 2015. № 2(6). S. 81-88

7. Tyufyakov N. A. Rol' truda kak sredstva ispravleniya po otechestvennomu i zarubezhnomu penitenciarnomu zakonodatel'stvu: problemy i puti resheniya // Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel'nyh organah. 2020. № 3(82). S. 345-351

8. Struchkov N. A., Natashev A. E. Osnovy teorii ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava. M. : Yurid. lit., 1967. 190 c

9. Shamsunov S. H., Pavlova E. V. Nekotorye voprosy privlecheniya k trudu osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody v sovremennyh usloviyah razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2017. № 2(43). S. 55-58


Login or Create
* Forgot password?