The article presents the results of the study of Spanish-language official documents and scientific literature on the legal formalization of disciplinary penalties sentenced to imprisonment in Spain. An attempt has been made to compare it with the disciplinary regime in force in Russia. The list of penalties in the normative acts of our countries is aimed at creating additional obstacles experienced by convicts in the process of serving imprisonment. All of them can be presented in the form of internal isolation, reducing the number of opportunities for movement in the institution and other penalties. The content of the conditions for serving penalties in domestic correctional institutions seems to be stricter, since some of them in Spain act as independent penalties. The existing arsenal of penalties is used unevenly by law enforcement agencies of both countries. Preference is given to internal insulation. In Russia, various locations are provided for serving continuous isolation, in Spain - serving a penalty in one place. Not only continuous isolation is allowed, which means that the convicted person is in solitary confinement for a certain period, but also intermittent isolation, which makes it impossible for the convicted person to leave the cell on a day off, as well as partial isolation - for a certain period of time during the day. The Spanish violator, while serving a penalty in the form of isolation, actually remains in a familiar environment, unlike a convict in Russia, who is moved to fundamentally different conditions, and in the case of transfer to a single cell-type room for up to one year, also to another institution. Spanish penitentiary legislation demonstrates the legal structure of the system of disciplinary responsibility of those sentenced to imprisonment. Its elements are: a) the list of offenses, in Articles 108-110 RP81; b) the list of penalties, fixed in Article 42 LOGP; c) the ratio of offenses and penalties, noted in Article 233 RP; d) the regulatory consolidation of the procedure for the application of penalties. In Russia, with the exception of a disciplinary fine, the procedure for applying penalties is not detai
penalties, convicts, imprisonment, legal regulation, Spain
1. Firsov G. A. Mery vzyskaniya, primenyaemye k osuzhdennym, zlostno narushayuschim trebovaniya rezhima v ITK / nauch. red. i predisl. A. S. Mihlin. M. : VNII MVD SSSR, 1979. 102 c
2. Fedyaev A. E. Mery vzyskaniya, primenyaemye k osuzhdennym, otbyvayuschim nakazanie v ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah Rossiyskoy Federacii : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2005. 205 s
3. Renart, G. F. 2002, ‘El sistema de sanciones en el régimen disciplinario penitenciario’, La Ley: Revistajurídica Española de doctrina, jurisprudencia y bibliografía, iss. 2, p. 4, viewed 24 March 2022, https://perso.unifr.ch/derechopenal/assets/files/articulos/a_20080526_82.pdf
4. Jimenez, V. J. 1993, ‘Regimen disciplinario y beneficios penitenciarios’, Eguzkilore, iss. 7, pp. 107-123, viewed 24 March 2022, https://www.ehu.eus/documents/1736829/2169056/11+- +Regimen+disciplinario+y+beneficios+penitenciarios.pdf
5. Launes, C. Á. 2016, El regimen disciplinario y su procedimiento en el sistema penitenciario Español: thesis doctoral, viewed 24 March 2022, http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/ eserv/tesisuned:Derecho-Acolmenar/COLMENAR_LAUNES_Angel_Tesis.pdf
6. Disciplinarnaya otvetstvennost' osuzhdennyh, otbyvayuschih nakazanie v ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah RF / sost. S. V. Isaev, G. V. Sitnikov ; pod obsch. red. S. V. Isaeva. Perm' : Permskiy regional'nyy pravozaschitnyy centr, 2015
7. Lozhkina L. V. Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya disciplinarnyh vzyskaniy v otnoshenii osuzhdennyh v ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser. Ekonomika i pravo. 2015. T. 25, Vyp. 2. S. 126-129
8. Epaneshnikov V. S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' lic, otbyvayuschih nakazanie v vide lisheniya svobody : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2000. 40 s
9. Krasotkin P. N. Aktual'nye voprosy praktiki primeneniya mer vzyskaniy k osuzhdennym k lisheniyu svobody // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. 2017. № 1(30). S. 77-82
10. Golovastova Yu. A., Gordopolov A. N. K voprosu o special'noy penitenciarnoy otvetstvennosti osuzhdennyh za sovershenie zlostnyh prostupkov v mestah lisheniya svobody // Vestnik Permskogo instituta FSIN Rossii. 2021. № 2(41). S. 29-37
