CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE ESSENCE AND CONTENT OF PUNISHMENT IN THE FORM OF RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The article highlights the problem of constitutional and legal understanding of the essence and content of punishment in the form of restriction of freedom. In connection with the adoption by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of a resolution concerning punishment in the form of restriction of freedom, the problem of determining its content has become more urgent, due to insufficient legislative specification of the list of legal restrictions that constitute its essence. In particular, the prohibition of approaching certain persons (contacting them) is logically necessary in situations of violent crimes. However, due to the absence of a direct reference to this wording in the criminal legislation, the status of such a ban remains uncertain, and the courts do not have the opportunity to use it when imposing punishment. In order to eliminate this contradiction, it is proposed to expand the powers of the courts in assigning certain legal restrictions to a convicted person, allowing him to control his behavior.

Keywords:
restriction of freedom, punishment, suspended sentence, social control, security measures
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Stepashin, V. M. 2011, ‘Appointment of punishment in the form of deprivation of a special, military or honorary title, class rank and state awards’, Bulletin of Omsk University, Series Law, iss. 2 (27), pp. 168–172.

2. Ignatov, A. N. 2015, ‘Socio-demographic and criminal-legal characteristics of the personality of a modern violent criminal’, Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow, iss. 4(39), pp. 93–98.

3. Karpov, A. A., Ryabykh, S. B. & Shcherbakov, A. V. 2024, ‘Criminological characteristics of the personality of a criminal who escaped from supervision’, Penal system: law, economics, management, iss. 3, pp. 6–10.

4. Shchedrin, N. 2008, ‘Four "tracks" of Russian criminal law’, Criminal law, iss. 4, pp. 59–63.

5. Teplyashin, P. V. 2011, ‘New law on criminal punishment in the form of restriction of freedom’, Legality, iss. 3(917), pp. 38–40.

6. Kozhevnikova, D. P. 2024, ‘Restriction of the rights and freedoms of persons sentenced to imprisonment as an element of their legal status’, Constitutionalism and state studies, iss. 1(33), pp. 51–55.

7. Miroshnichenko, D. G. 2024, ‘Restriction of freedom: some ways to improve the efficiency of the execution mechanism’, Bulletin of science, vol. 3, iss. 1(70), pp. 311–322.

8. Medvedev, A. A. 2024, ‘On the issue of the need for additional regulatory control over the execution of punishment in the form of restriction of freedom’, Bulletin of the penal system, iss. 3(262), pp. 32–36.

9. Dyadkin, D. S. 2010, ‘Competition of the norms on the appointment of punishment in the form of restriction of freedom with the norms on conditional sentencing’, Criminal law, iss. 3, pp. 34–37.

10. Razogreeva, A. M. & Minkov, M. 2010, ‘Conditional sentence and restriction of freedom: control and (or) resocialization’, Criminal law, iss. 4, pp. 47–51.

11. Kostenko, A. I. 2021, ‘Issues of Separating Restriction of Liberty as a Type of Criminal Punishment from Probation’, Scientific Education, iss. 1(10), pp. 142–143.

12. Usov, K. V. 2020, ‘Correlation of Restriction of Liberty with Probation’, in Bulletin of the young scientist of the Kuzbass Institute: collection of scientific articles, iss. 4, pp. 67–71, Kuzbass Institute of the FPS of the Russia, Novokuznetsk.

13. Kaishev, A. V. & Stepashin, V. M. 2021, ‘Universality of Probation’, Bulletin of Omsk University, Series Law, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 88–98.

14. Antonov, A. G. 2023, ‘On the Issue of the Repressiveness of Punishment in the Form of Restriction of Freedom’, Bulletin of the Tomsk Institute for Advanced Training of Employees of the FPS of Russia, iss. 3(17), pp. 7–12.

15. Noy, I. S. 1973, The Essence and Functions of Criminal Punishment in the Soviet State: A Political and Legal Study, Saratov.

16. Bavsun, M. V. 2010, ‘The Concept and Content of Criminal-Legal Impact on Crime’, Bulletin of Tomsk State University, iss. 336, pp. 99–102.

17. Tunina, N. A. 2010, ‘A Protection Order as a Method of Preventing Domestic Violence’, All-Russian Criminological Journal, iss. 4, pp. 78–82.

18. Gilinsky, I. Ya. 2002, ‘The Institute of Family in the System of "Deviance – Social Control"’, Criminology: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, iss. 1(2), pp. 34–41.

19. Zebnitskaya, A. K. 2020, ‘Stalking: Prospects for Regulation in the Legal Field of the Russian Federation’, Advocate Practice, iss. 3, pp. 50–54.

20. Kleymanov, M. S. 2021, ‘The Problem of Criminalization of Stalking in the Russian Federation’, Law and Right, iss. 5, pp. 133–135.

21. Ryzhova, O. A., Kornishina, Yu. S. 2018, ‘On Responsibility for Stalking in the Russian Federation and in Foreign Countries’, Science, Society, State, vol. 6, iss. 4(24), pp. 49–55.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?