UDK 343.842 Проерессивная или смешанная система
In the legal literature, the model of a progressive system of execution and serving of imprisonment is increasingly associated with a change in the legal status of a convicted person serving a criminal sentence, depending on the positive or negative behavior of the convicted person towards improvement or deterioration. Such judgments, in the author’s opinion, are not supported by the study of the progressive system from the position of the general definition of the system as a set of elements in mutual relations and connections forming a certain integrity, unity, as well as its understanding in the aspect of system analysis. To create a systematic understanding of the object of a progressive system with its systemic and legal characteristics, it is necessary to study it from the standpoint of system analysis, which is a means of improving and developing the current state of the progressive system as a whole (increasing its effectiveness). In the domestic legal literature, the systemic status of the object of the progressive system is not studied from the indicated positions. To show more clearly the features of the inseparability of system analysis from the object of the system (a person in custody; a person sentenced to imprisonment; For the first time, an attempt was made to create a systemic legal model of the systemic status of an object of a progressive system. In addition, the definition of the concept of the systemic status of an object of a progressive system is constructed, as well as its author’s concept is proposed, the structural elements of the systemic status of an object of a progressive system proposed for discussion are analyzed. The judgments given in the study have not yet found their completeness and are debatable, but their comprehensive study will allow us to take a different look at the reflection of the current concept of a progressive system in the norms of domestic legislation.
progressive system, imprisonment, system analysis, status, object, system functions, system rights, legitimate interests, system guarantees, system properties
1. Gig, Dzh. van. 1981, Applied general theory of systems, translated from English, World, Moscow.
2. Gorban’, D. V. 2016, ‘Progressive system of execution and serving of criminal sentences and its elements’, in Fighting crime: theory and practice: a series of reports of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Mogilev, March 25, 2016), pp. 344–347, Mogilev Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, Mogilev.
3. Krymov, A. A. 2017, ‘Some problems of regulation of the criminal procedural rights of convicts’, Legal science and law enforcement practice, iss. 2(40), pp. 98–103.
4. Lucenko, E. V. 2006, ‘Quantitative measures of increasing emergence in the process of system evolution (within the framework of the system theory of information)’, Polythematic online electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University, iss. 21, pp. 1–20.
5. Lucenko, E. V. & Laptev, V. N. 2007, ‘Automated system analysis as a means of re-syn- thesis of the model of an active control object when it passes the bifurcation point’, Polythemat- ic online electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University, iss. 30, pp. 1–19.
6. Lucenko, E. V. 2020, ‘A systematic generalization of the Ashby principle and an increase in the level of consistency of the model of the object of knowledge as a necessary condition for the adequacy of the process of its cognition’, Polythematic online electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University, iss. 163, pp. 100–134.
7. Malin, P. M. 2009, ‘Distribution of persons sentenced to imprisonment by danger levels as a necessary condition for the implementation of international standards for the treatment of prisoners in correctional institutions in Russia’, Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute, iss. 3(12), pp. 15–18.
8. Malin, P. M. 2011, ‘On the need to take into account the theory of systems in the study of the progressive system of execution and serving of criminal sentences’, Penal law, iss. 2(12). pp. 80–83.
9. Malin, P. M. 2018, ‘On the elements (subsystems) of progressive systems for the execution and serving of criminal penalties and criminal law measures’, Penal law, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 282–288.
10. Malin, P. M. 2021, ‘On the systemic properties of the progressive system of execution and serving of imprisonment’, Penal law, vol. 16, iss. 4, pp. 431–438.
11. Skakov, A. B. 2004, The progressive system of execution of imprisonment and its reflection in the new legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Norma-K, Astana.
12. Skiba, A. P., Skorik, E. N. 2016, ‘On the issue of means of correction of sick convicts’, North Caucasian Legal Bulletin, iss. 2, pp. 108–114.
13. Surmin, Ju. P. 2003, Systems theory and system analysis: textbook, MAUP, Kyiv.
14. Tkachevskij, Ju. M. 2007, The Russian progressive system of execution of criminal penalties, Gorodets, Moscow.
15. Seliverstov, V. I. (ed.) 2001, Penal law of Russia: textbook, 2nd edn, Lawyer, Moscow.
