UDC 328.185
The publication examines the List of corruption-related functions approved by the Order of the Federal Penitentiary Service dated September 5, 2014 No. 178-R. In the process of preparing the publication, the method of system-structural analysis was used, which made it possible to argue that the content of the List does not fully correspond to the functional specifics of the activities of institutions and bodies executing punishments, and attention is drawn to the inconsistency of its formation. The author has divided the corruption-dangerous functions fixed in the List into four independent groups. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that some of the fixed corruption-dangerous functions are quite spatial, and some duplicate each other, which indicates its imperfection. As a conclusion, the need to optimize the List of corruption-dangerous functions of the Federal Penitentiary Service is noted.
corruption-hazardous functions, official crime, penitentiary crime, corruption, criminogenic risks, institutions and bodies of the penitentiary system
1. Shurinov V. V. 2024, Crimes in the sphere of procurement of goods, works, and services to meet state and municipal needs: criminological characteristics, determination, and prevention: PhD thesis (Law), Krasnodar.
2. Nasreddinova, K. A., Khasnutdinov, R. R. & Yavorsky, M. A. 2018, ‘Corruption risks in the financial and economic activities of bodies and institutions of the penal system of the Russian Federation’, Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute, iss. 3(29), pp. 37–47.
3. Nechaev, A. D. & Tishchenko E. V. 2013, ‘Criminal law risks in the sphere of fulfillment of obligations by the parties to the state and municipal contract’, Space of Economics, iss. 3-2, pp. 176–184.
4. Shurpaev, Sh. M. 2019, ‘Public procurement as a sphere of corruption risks’, in E. V. Tro- fimov (ed.), Modern trends in the development of private law, enforcement proceedings and methods of legal protection: materials of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference, in 2 vols, pp. 123–127.
5. Tamazov, E. I. 2025, ‘Corruption risks in the field of public order protection’, Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences, iss. 1, pp. 139–143.
6. Babaev, M. M. 2018, ‘Risks as a component of the determinative complex of crime. Legal science and practice’, Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, iss. 1(41), pp. 104–110.
7. Rozhdestvenskaya, E. Y. 2009, ‘The phenomenon of risk in modern scientific discourse’, Vestnik VSU, Series Linguistics and intercultural communication, iss. 1, pp. 162–164.
8. Kotelnikova, O. A. & Milezhik, A. V. 2021, ‘Types of corruption risks in the activities of law enforcement officers’, Civil service and personnel, iss. 5, pp. 242–244.
9. Matskevich, I. M., Antonyan, E. A. & Aminov, I. I. 2017, Mechanisms for countering corruption risks in institutions executing sentences, Scientific Consultant, Moscow.
10. Antonyan, E. A. 2016, ‘Countering corruption risks in the penal system’, Gaps in Russian legislation, iss. 8, pp. 248–251.
11. Sivtsov, S. A. 2021, ‘Corruption risks in institutions and bodies of the penal system of the Russian Federation’, in St. Petersburg Penitentiary Conferences: proceedings of the conference (St. Petersburg, May 17–18, 2021), in 4 vols, vol. 3, pp. 80–83, St. Petersburg University of the FPS of Russia, St. Petersburg.
12. Prosumentov, L. M., Dobrusina, M. E. & Nabeeva, N. G. 2019, ‘Corruption risks: classification, assessment and measures aimed at their prevention’, Bulletin of Tomsk the State University, iss. 445, pp. 210–216.
13. Shepelev, D. V. 2019, ‘Conducting an assessment of corruption risks in federal executive authorities performing control and supervisory functions’, Actual problems of the state and law, vol. 3, iss. 10, pp. 190–199.
14. Bugaevskaya, N. V. 2014, ‘Legally significant actions as a form of expression of organizational and administrative functions of officials in corruption crimes’, Eurasian Union of Scientists, iss. 7-5, viewed 22 January 2025, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yuridicheski- znachimye-deystviya-kak-forma-vyrazheniya-organizatsionno-rasporyaditelnyh-funktsiy- dolzhnostnyh-lits-v-korruptsionnyh.
15. Sokolova, O. V. & Stepanova, I. B. 2019, ‘Corruption-related functions of the Federal Penitentiary Service: problematic aspects’, in IV International Penitentiary Forum "Crime, Punishment, correction": collection of theses. the ledge. and the list of participants (on the 140th anniversary of the Russian penal system and the 85th anniversary of the Academy of the FPS of Russia) Ryazan, November 20–22, 2019, in 10 vols, vol. 6, pp. 261–265, Academy of the FPS of Russia, Ryazan.
