Russian Federation
In the article, taking into account some shortcomings of the regulation of the institution of parole in Russia, the corresponding Chinese experience is analyzed. Attention is drawn to the point system for evaluating the correction of a convict in China for subsequent decision-making on his parole. The criteria for assessing the degree of correction of convicts, the specifics of accrual (deduction) of points, including in relation to certain categories of convicts, the circumstances of making a positive or other assessment of correction, the corresponding powers of the working group of the prison administration are highlighted. The conclusion is formulated that in China there is a clear and formalized approach to assessing the degree of correction of convicts, which allows the court to make a sufficiently objective decision on their parole.
parole, correction of convicts, point system of assessment, China
1. Malikov B. Z. Vyrazhenie i realizaciya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v nakazanii i nekaratel'nyh merah ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2014. № 4(87). S. 10-16
2. Santashov A. L., Skakov A. B. Ideya progressivnoy sistemy ispolneniya ugolovnyh nakazaniy i ee razvitie v otechestvennoy penitenciarnoy nauke // Penitenciarnaya nauka. 2020. T. 14, № 2(50). S. 176-184
3. Boyakova T. L., Churakov V. G., Lopina M. V., Solomatin S. V. Institut uslovnodosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya v raznyh stranah i ego sovershenstvovanie v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta FSIN Rossii. 2020. № 1. S. 164-169
4. Fung Ngok Hay, Ngo Van Vin'. Institut uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya v razlichnyh stranah i ego sovershenstvovanie vo V'etname // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo. 2018. T. 13, № 3. S. 329-333
5. Kashuba Yu. A., Skiba A. P. Institut uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya: novyy vzglyad // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2011. № 1. S. 14-17
6. Maslennikova E. A. Klassifikaciya mer preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy lic, bol'nyh hronicheskim alkogolizmom // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2015. № 2(89). S. 115-119
7. Myahanova A. N., Sin'kov D. V. K voprosu o korrupcii pri uslovno-dosrochnom osvobozhdenii // Vestnik Omskoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2018. T. 15, № 3. S. 292-297
8. Pupysheva L. A. Protivodeystvie korrupcii v sfere primeneniya uslovnodosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie. 2017. № 1(37). S. 49-53
9. Rastoropov S. V., Rybakov A. A. Kontrol' za licami, uslovno-dosrochno osvobozhdennymi ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya : monografiya. SPb. : Yurid. centr Press, 2017. 152 s
10. Korotkih N. N. Uchet lichnosti osuzhdennogo za mnozhestvennost' prestupleniy pri uslovno-dosrochnom osvobozhdenii // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2015. T. 9, № 3. S. 440-446
11. Santashov A. L., Zinov'ev I. L. Voprosy uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya i zameny nakazaniya v vide prinuditel'nyh rabot v deystvuyuschem zakonodatel'stve // Zakon i pravo. 2017. № 4. S. 82-83
12. Skiba A. P., Myahanova A. N., Dondokova M. Yu. Otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe prinyatie resheniya i inye voprosy uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya po Ugolovnomu kodeksu Kitaya (sravnitel'nyy analiz s nekotorymi normami zakonodatel'stva Rossii) // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo. 2020. T. 15(1-4), № 4. S. 421-427
13. Skiba A. P., Myahanova A. N., Dondokova M. Yu. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie: kitayskiy opyt (po materialam praktiki Verhovnogo narodnogo suda Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki) // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo. 2021. T. 16(1-4), № 4. S. 474-479
